Endorsements
"probably the most prolific anti frack website in the UK"
- Ken Wilkinson - prominent pro-fracking activist and industry supporter (Yes we know , he doesn't know what "prolific" means does he)

Private Eye

Defend Localism!

Take the advice of Greg Clark, ex-Secretary of State for the Department for Communities and Local Government

Greg Clark

"Those who are prepared to organise to be more effective and more efficient should be able to reap substantially the rewards of that boldness ...

Take power now. Don’t let yourself, any longer, be ruled by someone else"

How many wells?
PNRAG Wells
Click the image from more information on Cuadrilla's plans for PEDL 165
Fracking Employment

From the Financial Times 16 October 2013

AMEC forecast just 15,900 to 24,300 nationwide - direct & indirect

Jobs would typically be short term, at between four and nine years

Only 17% of jobs so far have gone to local people

Rubbish!

Looking for misinformation, scaremongering, lies or stupidity?

It's all on this website (but only on this one post ) featuring the Reverend Mike Roberts.

(Oops - there's more! )

Here though is our favourite Reverend Roberts quote of all time - published in the Lancashire Evening Post on 5th August 2015

"If you dare oppose fracking you will get nastiness and harassment whether on social media, or face-to-face"

Yes you!
"Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing's going to get better. It's not." - Dr Seuss
We are not for sale!
England is not for sale!
Wrongmove

Join the ever growing number of households who have signed up to the Wrongmove campaign!

Tell Cuadrilla and the Government that your house is "Not for Shale"

Wrongmove
Be a flea
"Many fleas make big dog move"
Japanese Proverb quoted by Jessica Ernst
No to Fracking
Love Lytham Say No to Fracking
Make sense?
The Precautionary Principle

When an activity or occurrence raises threats of serious or irreversible harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.
Contact Us
Click here to contact us by email
Private Eye
How can I help?
Find out here
Email updates

Subscribe to our mailing list

Follow us on Twitter
Our Tweets

The Infrastructure Bill debate

So what happened yesterday?

Well first of all we were treated to a report from the Commons Environmental Audit Committee. This hard-hitting report was hugely critical of fracking. It made it abundantly clear that fracking was incompatible with the UK’s obligations towards climate change mitigation. The full text of its conclusions and recommendations can be found here

Then we had Frackgate – It was revealed that Chancellor George Osborne had sent a letter to members of the cabinet committee on economic affairs requesting that ministers make dozens of interventions to fast-track shale gas drilling. The text of the letter can be found here

With a woeful day in prospect for the fracking industry shares in iGas plummeted to a new low of 18.25p – down from 27.25 at the start of trading.

In the afternoon we had farce of 2 hour debate on amendments to the infrastructure bill. Many MPs complained that they were being allowed insufficient time to make their points, and we watched Caroline Lucas MP valiantly gabbling to make her points in the limited time available (Bizarrely in the debate on the bill itself we were treated to various MPs droning on interminably about whether pubs should be allowed to be closed or not – perhaps it’s not hard to divine where their priorities lie is it?)

We also learned more about the problematic issue of the redacted sections on fracking’s potential impact on house prices in the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs report on the impacts of fracking on the rural economy.

Amber Rudd MP told us: “If somebody in another Department has prepared something, a junior member perhaps, and it was not appropriate for them to have done so, which is a comment I have fairly made, I do not think it is appropriate for it to be released. It could mislead the public. It is because I am so concerned about the public that we have taken this view

Well thank goodness we have people like her to look after us is all I can say. Imagine that [redacted] was allowed to write such a report!

On to the voting – Drill Or Drop reported it like this:

Vote 1 on specific fracking regulations
New Clause 1 proposed by shadow ministers Tom Greatrex, Richard Burden and Robert Blackman-Woods. This would have amended the Environmental Permitting Regulations to include specific regulations on hydraulic fracturing operations, exploration, drilling wells, decommissioning and long-term maintenance.

Result
Those in favour 224
Those against 320
New clause not included in the Infrastructure Bill

Vote 2 on devolving licensing and mineral access rights to Scotland

New Clause 2 proposed by shadow ministers Tom Greatrex, Richard Burden and Robert Blackman-Woods. This would amend the Scotland Act to give the Scottish Government responsibility for licensing and mineral access rights for onshore shale gas extraction

Result
Those in favour 231
Those against 324
New clause not included in the Infrastructure Bill

Vote 3 on a fracking moratorium
New clause 9 proposed by Yasmin Qureshi, Mr Roger Godsiff, Martin Caton, Mr Michael Thornton, John Mann, Caroline Lucas, Hywel Williams, Dr Julian Huppert, Dr Alan Whitehead, Mr Mark Williams, Joan Walley, Roger Williams, Jeremy Corbyn. This would declare a moratorium on fracking while an independent assessment was carried out into the impact of unconventional petroleum on climate change, the environment, health and safety and the economy.

Result
Those in favour 52
Those against 308
Most Labour MPs abstained in the vote
New clause not included in the Infrastructure Bill

Labour’s proposed additional fracking regulations

New clause 19 proposed by Tom Greatrex, shadow energy secretary Caroline Flint and Geraint Davies, Labour MP for Swansea West. This set conditions for hydraulic fracturing to take place. This included:

Environmental Impact Assessments
Independent inspections on well integrity
Monitoring on the site for the previous 12 months
Site-by-site measurement, monitoring and public disclosure of existing the fugitive emissions

No fracking can take place in

Groundwater source protection zones
Protected areas
On land under 1,000m

Also required:

Planning authorities consider the cumulative impact of fracking activities
Provision of community benefit schemes
Residents in affected areas notified individually
Substances used subject to approval of the Environment Agency
Land is left in condition required by the planning authority
Water companies are consulted by planning authorities

The government accepted this new clause as part of the bill and there was no vote.

We believe that although this is something of a fudge by the labour party who are clearly ambivalent on the subject of fracking, the extra requirements do go some way towards safeguarding communities if fracking is indeed forced upon us.

The requirements are still woolly in many places and we predict that they will be the subject of much debate between communities, government and the industry over the coming months and years.

We also believe that the industry will be spitting feathers at what has been described by some newspapers as a U-Turn by the government, and the introduction of new regulations which will further slow down any development of shale gas extraction in the UK. They will be particularly exercised by the provision that “Planning authorities consider the cumulative impact of fracking activities“. If any proof were needed that we did not have what MP Mark Menzies has continually referred to as a “gold standard” of regulation, then the fact that this amendment went though without a division vote is a clear demonstration of that.

As an article in The Lawyer commented

“The House of Lords will now have an opportunity to consider the amendments made by the Commons. Unless
some changes are made to clarify the less tidy parts of the new clause’s drafting, uncertainties over what it
requires may lead to a moratorium on GB fracking by the back door if and when the new clause comes into effect.”

At the time of writing 10:00 am on Tuesday 27th January iGas shares have still not recovered significantly and are trading at 20.00p. The market is still talking to us. Are we listening?

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

We’re not Backing Fracking
Not Backing Fracking
... but we love their web site
Drill or Drop
Drill or Drop
Drill or Drop is a "must read" resource for those wanting to keep up to date on the issues.
Fracking here’s a bad idea!
Who's fault?

"What you have to be able to do when you decide you want to hydraulic fracture is make sure there are no faults in the area. That's really very very important"

Professor Mike Stephenson - Director of Science and Technology - British Geological Survey

Fracking the UK
Fracking The UK

Fracking the UK Volumes I and II now available free from this site

"Untrustworthy, unbalanced and potentially brain washing." - Amazon Review
Yes the industry hated the first volume that much :-)

Both volumes now available as free downloads from this site Click here to download

Fracking in the Media
Campaign Groups


Frack Free Lancashire
Frack Free Lancashire
Preston New Road Action Group
Preston New Road Action Group

Roseacre Awareness Group
Roseacre Awareness Group

Refracktion
Refracktion

Defend Lytham
Defend Lytham

RAFF Group
RAFF Group

REAF Group

Ribble Estuary Against Fracking

Fracking Free Ireland
Fracking Free Ireland

Fracking Digest
Fracking Digest – a summary of the week’s news

Frack Free Balcombe
Frack Free Balcombe Residents Association

Frack Free Sussex
Frack Free Sussex

Frack Free York
Frack Free York

Halsall Against Fracking
Halsall Against Fracking

If you would like your group to be added please contact us

Other Groups
Categories
November 2017
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930