Endorsements

"probably the most prolific anti frack website in the UK"
- Ken Wilkinson - prominent pro-fracking activist and industry supporter (Yes we know , he doesn't know what "prolific" means does he)

Private Eye

Defend Localism!

Take the advice of Greg Clark, ex-Secretary of State for the Department for Communities and Local Government

Greg Clark

"Those who are prepared to organise to be more effective and more efficient should be able to reap substantially the rewards of that boldness ...

Take power now. Don’t let yourself, any longer, be ruled by someone else"

How many wells?

PNRAG Wells
Click the image from more information on Cuadrilla's plans for PEDL 165

Fracking Employment

From the Financial Times 16 October 2013

AMEC forecast just 15,900 to 24,300 nationwide - direct & indirect

Jobs would typically be short term, at between four and nine years

Only 17% of jobs so far have gone to local people

Rubbish!

Looking for misinformation, scaremongering, lies or stupidity?

It's all on this website (but only on this one post ) featuring the Reverend Mike Roberts.

(Oops - there's more! )

Here though is our favourite Reverend Roberts quote of all time - published in the Lancashire Evening Post on 5th August 2015

"If you dare oppose fracking you will get nastiness and harassment whether on social media, or face-to-face"

Yes you!

"Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing's going to get better. It's not." - Dr Seuss

We are not for sale!

England is not for sale!

Wrongmove

Join the ever growing number of households who have signed up to the Wrongmove campaign!

Tell Cuadrilla and the Government that your house is "Not for Shale"

Wrongmove

Be a flea

"Many fleas make big dog move"
Japanese Proverb quoted by Jessica Ernst

No to Fracking

Love Lytham Say No to Fracking

Make sense?

The Precautionary Principle

When an activity or occurrence raises threats of serious or irreversible harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.

Contact Us

Click here to contact us by email
Private Eye

How can I help?

Find out here

Email updates

Subscribe to our mailing list

Follow us on Twitter

Our Tweets

This is a biggy of course, and as with many of the claims made about fracking we need to be careful of weasel words.

In this case the culprit is most often the word “fracking” itself.

If somebody tells you “fracking is safe” you probably think they mean the entire process of extracting gas from shale using hydraulic fracturing. If somebody from the industry makes this claim and you question it, you will often find that they are limiting themselves to the process of fracturing the shale, and not referring to blasting the shale with fracking fluid, or maintaining well integrity or the dozen other areas that we, the public all think of as “fracking”, but which they conveniently exclude when they say “fracking is safe”

In their newsletter, 30,000 copies of which were distributed, Cuadrilla claimed:

We also know that hydraulic fracturing does not lead to contamination of the underground aquifer.

on their website they do admit

In the US, only a handful of operations have led to the subsurface environment being contaminated with natural gas, with bad well design the cause – not hydraulic fracturing.

Now can you see what we are getting at – they are telling us fracking is safe – it’s just the well design that isn’t! But why should you or we care about which part of the process they are talking about. It’s not as if they are not responsible for the well casing is it? If our water gets contaminated we are hardly going to excuse them on the basis of these silly verbal gymnastics are we?

Sadly it’s not just Cuadrilla who are weasel wording their way into getting people to accept fracking. Even government ministers, who should certainly know a lot better, are at it.

John Hayes, the Energy Minister, who has shown himself to be very friendly to anyone who favours the dash for gas, embarrassed himself and the government in December 2012 by stating in an interview on Radio 5 Live reported in the Daily Telegraph that,

the idea that that water will get into the main water table has been categorically denied. The claim that the water used in fracking gets into the aquifer was categorically refuted by the Durham University study earlier this year

As the Telegraph went on to explain though this didn’t please the study’s author who had of course said no such thing.

However Prof Richard Davies, who led the study, said the water table can be contaminated if the drilling is too close to the water table.

“We have not proved it could not happen, what we have shown is the safety distance,” he said.

There may be little proven evidence of damage caused by the fracking process, but we need to remember that the damage we are learning about is relatively recent (even in America fracking like this has only been going on for a few years) and the wheels of the law do grind pretty slowly, especially when the industry employs non-disclosure agreements after settling complaints.

The people whose stories are captured here, on the ever-lengthening “List of the Harmed” don’t think that fracking is safe though. Far from it. The evidence may be anectdotal (i.e. not proven in court yet) but there is so much of it that we would be fools to ignore it and accept the bland reassurances of people who try to trick us with slick definitions and claims that nothing is “proven”. If that reminds you of the way that the tobacco industry claimed for decades that there was no proven link between smoking and lung cancer, ponder the fact that the same PR company that worked on keeping that fallacy alive a lot longer than some of the smokers works for the frackers today. Hill and Knowlton, have been hired by America’s Natural Gas Alliance to convince people that fracking, too, is safe. Does that not make them feel just a little bit dirty? It would seem not.

If we don’t want a similar “List of the Harmed” to be started for the Fylde we had all better start making sure Mr Menzies and his colleagues in the other constituencies stop being quite so self-congratulatory and start taking a long hard look at what regulation is really missing before they allow fracking to start again.

Of course not every public body is blind to the risks and wants to push ahead without due regard to the risks. Over in Northern Ireland the Institute of Environmental Health said in January 2013:

The risk posed by fracking remains significant, a leading environmental health expert in Northern Ireland has said. There are still too many unknowns and gaps in the evidence surrounding the emerging use of shale gas, said the director of the Institute of Environmental Health in Northern Ireland.


http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/northern-ireland/fracking-risk-remains-significant-16257157.html

The important thing tat we need to grasp is that ee won’t get two chances here. Once we have a problem we won’t be able to make it go away.


For more debunking of the frequently repeated lies of the fracking industry this video is hard to beat.

It’s remarkable how often we hear the same weasel words isn’t it? If you watch that video you will know what to listen out for …

4 Responses to Myth 7 – Fracking is safe

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

We’re not Backing Fracking

Not Backing Fracking
... but we love their web site

Drill or Drop

Drill or Drop
Drill or Drop is a "must read" resource for those wanting to keep up to date on the issues.

Fracking here’s a bad idea!

Who's fault?

"What you have to be able to do when you decide you want to hydraulic fracture is make sure there are no faults in the area. That's really very very important"

Professor Mike Stephenson - Director of Science and Technology - British Geological Survey

Fracking the UK

Fracking The UK

Fracking the UK Volumes I and II now available free from this site

"Untrustworthy, unbalanced and potentially brain washing." - Amazon Review
Yes the industry hated the first volume that much :-)

Both volumes now available as free downloads from this site Click here to download

Fracking in the Media

Campaign Groups


Frack Free Lancashire
Frack Free Lancashire
Preston New Road Action Group
Preston New Road Action Group

Roseacre Awareness Group
Roseacre Awareness Group

Refracktion
Refracktion

Defend Lytham
Defend Lytham

RAFF Group
RAFF Group

REAF Group

Ribble Estuary Against Fracking

Fracking Free Ireland
Fracking Free Ireland

Fracking Digest
Fracking Digest – a summary of the week’s news

Frack Free Balcombe
Frack Free Balcombe Residents Association

Frack Free Sussex
Frack Free Sussex

Frack Free York
Frack Free York

Halsall Against Fracking
Halsall Against Fracking

If you would like your group to be added please contact us

Other Groups

Categories

October 2017
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031